The impact of illness identity on recovery from severe mental illness: A test of the model

Philip T. Yanos, Shane Adams, David Roe, Paul H. Lysaker

פרסום מחקרי: פרסום בכתב עתמאמרביקורת עמיתים


Objective: The Illness Identity model posits that self-stigma reduces hope and self-esteem among persons with severe mental illnesses, impacting a range of outcomes. The “insight paradox” anticipates that the negative effects of self-stigma are amplified by insight. This study tested these predictions using both cluster and path analyses. Method: A total of 117 participants meeting the criteria for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders completed measures of self-stigma, self-esteem, hopelessness, insight, social functioning, coping, and symptoms. Results: Cluster analysis supported the insight paradox; persons with low self-stigma/high insight had fewer psychiatric symptoms and better interpersonal functioning than persons with high self-stigma/low insight. Path analysis did not support the insight paradox, but indicated that self-stigma and insight impact different outcomes. Discussion: Findings suggest that support for the predictions of the Illness Identity model and insight paradox are supported may depend on analytic method. Conclusions: Finding suggest that the benefits of self-stigma reduction may be constrained by insight.

שפה מקוריתאנגלית אמריקאית
עמודים (מ-עד)2341-2352
מספר עמודים12
כתב עתJournal of Clinical Psychology
מספר גיליון10
מזהי עצם דיגיטלי (DOIs)
סטטוס פרסוםפורסם - אוק׳ 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • ???subjectarea.asjc.3200.3203???
  • ???subjectarea.asjc.1200.1201???

טביעת אצבע

להלן מוצגים תחומי המחקר של הפרסום 'The impact of illness identity on recovery from severe mental illness: A test of the model'. יחד הם יוצרים טביעת אצבע ייחודית.

פורמט ציטוט ביבליוגרפי