Zuse’s Thesis, Gandy’s Thesis, and Penrose’s Thesis

B. Jack Copeland, Oron Shagrir, Mark Sprevak

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Konrad Zuse said that the entire universe is a computer. Robin Gandy said that the whole universe, if not a computer, is computable. Roger Penrose said that the universe is in part uncomputable. We survey the territory. Zuse’s thesis we believe to be plain false: the universe might have consisted of nothing but a giant computer, but in fact does not. Gandy viewed his thesis as a relatively a priori one, provable on the basis of a set-theoretic argument making only very general physical assumptions about decomposability into parts and the nature of causation. We maintain that Gandy’s proof does not work, and that his thesis is best viewed, like Penrose’s, as an open empirical hypothesis. But what kind of evidence is relevant to discovering the truth of the matter? We investigate.

Original languageAmerican English
Title of host publicationPhysical Perspectives on Computation, Computational Perspectives on Physics
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages39-59
Number of pages21
ISBN (Electronic)9781316759745
ISBN (Print)9781107171190
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2018

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Arts and Humanities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Zuse’s Thesis, Gandy’s Thesis, and Penrose’s Thesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this