TY - JOUR
T1 - Xampling at the rate of innovation
AU - Michaeli, Tomer
AU - Eldar, Yonina C.
N1 - Funding Information: Manuscript received May 17, 2011; revised September 18, 2011; accepted November 02, 2011. Date of publication December 07, 2011; date of current version February 10, 2012. The associate editor coordinating the review of this manuscript and approving it for publication was Prof. Xiang‐GenXia.Thiswork was supported in part by the Israel Science Foundation under Grant 170/10 and by a Google Research Award.
PY - 2012/3
Y1 - 2012/3
N2 - We address the problem of recovering signals from samples taken at their rate of innovation. Our only assumption is that the sampling system is such that the parameters defining the signal can be stably determined from the samples, a condition that lies at the heart of every sampling theorem. Consequently, our analysis subsumes previously studied nonlinear acquisition devices and nonlinear signal classes. In particular, we do not restrict attention to memoryless nonlinear distortions or to union-of-subspace models. This allows treatment of various finite-rate-of-innovation (FRI) signals that were not previously studied, including, for example, continuous phase modulation transmissions. Our strategy relies on minimizing the error between the measured samples and those corresponding to our signal estimate. This least-squares (LS) objective is generally nonconvex and might possess many local minima. Nevertheless, we prove that under the stability hypothesis, any optimization method designed to trap a stationary point of the LS criterion necessarily converges to the true solution. We demonstrate our approach in the context of recovering pulse streams in settings that were not previously treated. Furthermore, in situations for which other algorithms are applicable, we show that our method is often preferable in terms of noise robustness.
AB - We address the problem of recovering signals from samples taken at their rate of innovation. Our only assumption is that the sampling system is such that the parameters defining the signal can be stably determined from the samples, a condition that lies at the heart of every sampling theorem. Consequently, our analysis subsumes previously studied nonlinear acquisition devices and nonlinear signal classes. In particular, we do not restrict attention to memoryless nonlinear distortions or to union-of-subspace models. This allows treatment of various finite-rate-of-innovation (FRI) signals that were not previously studied, including, for example, continuous phase modulation transmissions. Our strategy relies on minimizing the error between the measured samples and those corresponding to our signal estimate. This least-squares (LS) objective is generally nonconvex and might possess many local minima. Nevertheless, we prove that under the stability hypothesis, any optimization method designed to trap a stationary point of the LS criterion necessarily converges to the true solution. We demonstrate our approach in the context of recovering pulse streams in settings that were not previously treated. Furthermore, in situations for which other algorithms are applicable, we show that our method is often preferable in terms of noise robustness.
KW - Finite rate of innovation
KW - Xampling
KW - generalized sampling
KW - iterative recovery
KW - nonlinear distortion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857227085&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TSP.2011.2178409
DO - 10.1109/TSP.2011.2178409
M3 - مقالة
SN - 1053-587X
VL - 60
SP - 1121
EP - 1133
JO - IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
JF - IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
IS - 3
M1 - 6096447
ER -