Abstract
In the current study, we examine why peer-to-peer (P2P) lending platforms play only a minor role in the finance industry in Israel, compared to the traditional banking system. We conducted two studies and attempted to discover if a discrepancy exists between the lenders' preferences and the platforms’ incentives. In the first study, we conducted a conjoint analysis to examine the impact of lenders' decisions to invest through P2P platforms. The second study examines the factors in which platforms use to determine the lending interest rate for loans. We found that although lenders wish to decrease their risk and guarantee their investment, P2P companies encourage riskier borrowers. This contradiction between the priorities of the lenders and those of the platforms may explain why the non-users consider P2P lending to be a high risk. We offer several suggestions to increase the attractiveness of the Fintech and lending platforms industry.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 709-738 |
| Number of pages | 30 |
| Journal | Electronic Commerce Research |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 17 Jun 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jun 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- Finance institutions
- Fintech
- Investments
- Lenders
- P2P lending platforms
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
- Human-Computer Interaction
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Why do peer-to-peer (P2P) lending platforms fail? The gap between P2P lenders' preferences and the platforms’ intentions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver