Abstract
Intention Cognitivism–the doctrine that intending to V entails, or even consists in, believing that one will V–is an important position with potentially wide-ranging implications, such as a revisionary understanding of practical reason, and a vindicating explanation of ‘Practical Knowledge.’ In this paper, I critically examine the standard arguments adduced in support of IC, including arguments from the parity of expression of intention and belief; from the ability to plan around one’s intention; and from the explanation provided by the thesis for our knowledge of our intentional acts. I conclude that none of these arguments are compelling, and therefore that no good reason has been given to accept IC.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 223-244 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Canadian Journal of Philosophy |
Volume | 48 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 4 Mar 2018 |
Keywords
- Intention
- avowals
- cognitivism about intention
- practical knowledge
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy