Why cognitivism?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Intention Cognitivism–the doctrine that intending to V entails, or even consists in, believing that one will V–is an important position with potentially wide-ranging implications, such as a revisionary understanding of practical reason, and a vindicating explanation of ‘Practical Knowledge.’ In this paper, I critically examine the standard arguments adduced in support of IC, including arguments from the parity of expression of intention and belief; from the ability to plan around one’s intention; and from the explanation provided by the thesis for our knowledge of our intentional acts. I conclude that none of these arguments are compelling, and therefore that no good reason has been given to accept IC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)223-244
Number of pages22
JournalCanadian Journal of Philosophy
Volume48
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 4 Mar 2018

Keywords

  • Intention
  • avowals
  • cognitivism about intention
  • practical knowledge

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why cognitivism?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this