TY - JOUR
T1 - Who gains the most quality-of-life benefits from metabolic and bariatric surgery
T2 - findings from the prospective REBORN cohort study
AU - Yousefi, Reyhaneh
AU - Ben-Porat, Tair
AU - Marques Vieira, Ariany
AU - Lavoie, Kim L.
AU - Bacon, Simon L.
AU - Bacon, S. L.
AU - Lavoie, K. L.
AU - Gautier, A.
AU - Marion, P.
AU - Alberga, A.
AU - Denis, R.
AU - Garneau, P.
AU - Lavigne, G.
AU - Pescarus, R.
AU - Raymond-Carrier, S.
AU - Santosa, S.
AU - Studer, A. S.
AU - Ben-Porat, T.
AU - Delaney, K.
AU - Fortin, A.
AU - Julien, C.
AU - Woods, R.
AU - Yousef, R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Background: Prioritizing patients for metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) based on their potential postoperative benefits is essential. Objectives: To examine changes in quality of life (QoL) during the initial postoperative year among patients with diverse eligibility statuses and determine which group experiences greater benefits. Setting: Center intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Nord-de-l'Île-de- Montréal (CIUSSS-NIM), Canada. Methods: We categorized patients into 3 groups based on obesity class and the presence of comorbidities: Group 1 (obesity class II without comorbidities, n = 28); Group 2 (obesity class II with comorbidities, n = 36); and Group 3 (obesity class III, n = 460). QoL (Short-Form QoL questionnaire [SF-12]) and anthropometrics were measured at 6 months before, and 6 and 12 months after surgery. Results: Repeated measures mixed models revealed a significant main effect of time (P < .001) and an interaction between time and group for the physical component of QoL (P = .007). These indicated consistent improvements across time in all groups, with the greatest benefits seen in Group 3 relative to Group 1. There were no interactions between time and group for the mental components of QoL (P = .402). There were significant interaction effects for weight and BMI (P's < .001), with Group 3 losing more weight than Groups 1 or 2. Conclusions: All groups that underwent MBS had improvements in the physical aspects of QoL and weight over time, even those who have traditionally not be considered eligible for MBS (i.e., Group 1). This provides a starting point to explore the importance of not excluding patients due to their weight and comorbidity status and setting comprehensive eligibility criteria encompassing all patients who might benefit from MBS, beyond just weight loss.
AB - Background: Prioritizing patients for metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) based on their potential postoperative benefits is essential. Objectives: To examine changes in quality of life (QoL) during the initial postoperative year among patients with diverse eligibility statuses and determine which group experiences greater benefits. Setting: Center intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Nord-de-l'Île-de- Montréal (CIUSSS-NIM), Canada. Methods: We categorized patients into 3 groups based on obesity class and the presence of comorbidities: Group 1 (obesity class II without comorbidities, n = 28); Group 2 (obesity class II with comorbidities, n = 36); and Group 3 (obesity class III, n = 460). QoL (Short-Form QoL questionnaire [SF-12]) and anthropometrics were measured at 6 months before, and 6 and 12 months after surgery. Results: Repeated measures mixed models revealed a significant main effect of time (P < .001) and an interaction between time and group for the physical component of QoL (P = .007). These indicated consistent improvements across time in all groups, with the greatest benefits seen in Group 3 relative to Group 1. There were no interactions between time and group for the mental components of QoL (P = .402). There were significant interaction effects for weight and BMI (P's < .001), with Group 3 losing more weight than Groups 1 or 2. Conclusions: All groups that underwent MBS had improvements in the physical aspects of QoL and weight over time, even those who have traditionally not be considered eligible for MBS (i.e., Group 1). This provides a starting point to explore the importance of not excluding patients due to their weight and comorbidity status and setting comprehensive eligibility criteria encompassing all patients who might benefit from MBS, beyond just weight loss.
KW - Eligibility
KW - Metabolic and bariatric surgery
KW - Obesity
KW - Postoperative outcomes
KW - Quality of life
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85204440410&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2024.08.029
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2024.08.029
M3 - Article
C2 - 39304457
SN - 1550-7289
VL - 20
SP - 1297
EP - 1305
JO - Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
JF - Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
IS - 12
ER -