Abstract
Objectives. This study assesses whether need-based grants are equally conducive to the college persistence of students from various economic strata and the extent to which a redistribution of funds can narrow economic-based inequality in college persistence. Methods. To estimate the causal effect of need-based grants on several persistence outcomes the discontinuity created in the dollar amounts of Pell grants when the students have siblings attending college is exploited. The analyses use a nationally representative sample of students enrolled at four-year institutions in 1995. Results. While the allocation of Pell Grants responds to students' pecuniary constraints, institutional and state grants expand the circle of recipients to more well-off students. Yet, it is only the persistence of students from the bottom half of the income distribution that is sensitive to aid amounts. If the need-based funds granted to affluent students had been diverted to these students, the gap in first-year persistence would have been closed. Conclusions. For a redistribution of funds to boost degree attainment and achieve equality of educational opportunity it must be based on stricter means-tested allocations of nonfederal funds as they are the main source of need-based aid.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 807-829 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Social Science Quarterly |
| Volume | 92 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2011 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Social Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Who benefits most from financial aid? The heterogeneous effect of need-based grants on students' college persistence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver