TY - JOUR
T1 - When temporal certainty doesn’t help
AU - Kusnir, Flor
AU - Pesin, Slav
AU - Moscona, Gal
AU - Landau, Ayelet N.
N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by funds from the James McDonnell Scholar Award for Understanding Human Cognition, the National Israeli Psychobiology Institute, and the Israel Science Foundation (all awarded to A. N. L.). As a library fellow, A. N. L. Publisher Copyright: © 2019 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - In a dynamically changing environment, the ability to capture regularities in our sensory input helps us generate predictions about future events. In most sensory systems, the basic finding is clear: Knowing when something will happen improves performance on it [Nobre, A. C., & van Ede, F. (2017). Anticipated moments: Temporal structure in attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 19, 34–48, 2017]. We here examined the impact of temporal predictions on a less-explored modality: touch. Participants were instructed to detect a brief target embedded in an ongoing vibrotactile stimulus. Unbeknownst to them, the experiment had two timing conditions: In one part, the time of target onset was fixed and thus temporally predictable, whereas in the other, it could appear at a random time within the ongoing stimulation. We found a clear modulation of detection thresholds due to temporal predictability: Contrary to other sensory systems, detecting a predictable tactile target was worse relative to unpredictable targets. We discuss our findings within the framework of tactile suppression.
AB - In a dynamically changing environment, the ability to capture regularities in our sensory input helps us generate predictions about future events. In most sensory systems, the basic finding is clear: Knowing when something will happen improves performance on it [Nobre, A. C., & van Ede, F. (2017). Anticipated moments: Temporal structure in attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 19, 34–48, 2017]. We here examined the impact of temporal predictions on a less-explored modality: touch. Participants were instructed to detect a brief target embedded in an ongoing vibrotactile stimulus. Unbeknownst to them, the experiment had two timing conditions: In one part, the time of target onset was fixed and thus temporally predictable, whereas in the other, it could appear at a random time within the ongoing stimulation. We found a clear modulation of detection thresholds due to temporal predictability: Contrary to other sensory systems, detecting a predictable tactile target was worse relative to unpredictable targets. We discuss our findings within the framework of tactile suppression.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077404284&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01482
DO - https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01482
M3 - Article
C2 - 31633463
SN - 0898-929X
VL - 32
SP - 315
EP - 325
JO - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
JF - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
IS - 2
ER -