Abstract
Many individuals diagnosed with psychosis make multiple attempts to discontinue antipsychotic medications. In this clinical challenge, we examine three snapshots in which shared decision-making (SDM) breaks down due to ongoing disagreement between the service user and the health care provider. We offer three perspectives on how to think about such disagreement: philosophical, psychological, and psychiatric perspectives. Finally, we propose shared deliberation as a potential model for when SDM fails, emphasizing an iterative process of mutual value sharing that avoids binary yes/no responses.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 170-177 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Harvard Review of Psychiatry |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 9 May 2025 |
Keywords
- autonomy
- justice
- psychosis
- shared decision-making
- shared deliberation
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Psychiatry and Mental health
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'When Shared Decision-Making Breaks Down: Solving Moral Dilemmas in Antipsychotic Deprescribing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver