When Shared Decision-Making Breaks Down: Solving Moral Dilemmas in Antipsychotic Deprescribing

Helene Speyer, Ju Zhang, John Lysaker, David Roe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Many individuals diagnosed with psychosis make multiple attempts to discontinue antipsychotic medications. In this clinical challenge, we examine three snapshots in which shared decision-making (SDM) breaks down due to ongoing disagreement between the service user and the health care provider. We offer three perspectives on how to think about such disagreement: philosophical, psychological, and psychiatric perspectives. Finally, we propose shared deliberation as a potential model for when SDM fails, emphasizing an iterative process of mutual value sharing that avoids binary yes/no responses.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)170-177
Number of pages8
JournalHarvard Review of Psychiatry
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 9 May 2025

Keywords

  • autonomy
  • justice
  • psychosis
  • shared decision-making
  • shared deliberation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When Shared Decision-Making Breaks Down: Solving Moral Dilemmas in Antipsychotic Deprescribing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this