Abstract
Many individuals diagnosed with psychosis make multiple attempts to discontinue antipsychotic medications. In this clinical challenge, we examine three snapshots in which shared decision-making (SDM) breaks down due to ongoing disagreement between the service user and the health care provider. We offer three perspectives on how to think about such disagreement: philosophical, psychological, and psychiatric perspectives. Finally, we propose shared deliberation as a potential model for when SDM fails, emphasizing an iterative process of mutual value sharing that avoids binary yes/no responses.
Original language | American English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 170-177 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Harvard Review of Psychiatry |
Volume | 33 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 9 May 2025 |
Keywords
- autonomy
- justice
- psychosis
- shared decision-making
- shared deliberation
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Psychiatry and Mental health