"When possible, make a U-turn": Reflecting on 'the narrative turn', meaning, morality and identity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper discusses the problematic consequences of labeling Bruner and MacIntyre's work under the heading 'narrative turn'. I argue that their focus on narrative was secondary to larger projects with more important implications for psychology which have unfortunately garnered less attention and have yet to be realized. Bruner's intent was to establish meaning-making as the central concept of psychology. MacIntyre's concern was with establishing grounds for moral living. Identity was conceived of as a crucial explanatory concept in the psychosocial construction of meaning and\or the good life. Understanding narrative however, although considered important, was not the primary goal of their efforts. I propose refocusing on these original goals and on identity processes, be they narrative or paradigmatic, as they are involved in the ongoing organization of interpretive and evaluative meaning systems that are the grounds for intentionality and agency.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)186-193
Number of pages8
JournalNarrative Inquiry
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Keywords

  • Goals of psychology
  • Meaning-making
  • Narrative and paradigmatic identity
  • Narrative turn
  • The cognitive revolution
  • The good life

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • History
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '"When possible, make a U-turn": Reflecting on 'the narrative turn', meaning, morality and identity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this