When experts disagree: Sourcing practices while reading conflicting online information sources

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

Abstract

Laypeople who use the Internet to learn about issues of personal or social relevance often encounter online information sources that present conflicting expert accounts. The aim of the current study was to provide a close observation of spontaneous sourcing practices while reading conflicting online information sources, to examine the relation between sourcing while reading and subsequent argument construction, and to assess the role of epistemic perspectives, topic interest, and topic knowledge in sourcing. 61 university students thought aloud while reading four blog-posts that provided conflicting accounts of a socio-scientific controversy. The findings revealed a wide range of sourcing practices. High sourcing participants made more sourcing activities, paid more attention to source characteristics, and made source-source comparisons. Higher levels of sourcing were found to be related to subsequent argument complexity. Epistemic perspectives and gender played a significant role in sourcing practices ad highlighted their socio-cultural nature.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)721-728
Number of pages8
JournalProceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS
Volume2
Issue numberJanuary
StatePublished - 2014
Event11th International Conference of the Learning Sciences: Learning and Becoming in Practice, ICLS 2014 - Boulder, United States
Duration: 23 Jun 201427 Jun 2014

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Computer Science (miscellaneous)
  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When experts disagree: Sourcing practices while reading conflicting online information sources'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this