@inproceedings{68740494096a47de847b8bd681fc55b5,
title = "When a paradigm is inconsistent with intuition: The case of inconsistency management",
abstract = "The acceptance and correct use of new paradigms in information systems engineering is highly affected by cognitive dispositions of the individual engineers. In particular, the engineers{\textquoteright} intuition–based on their vast experience–may come in the way of accepting the rationale of a new paradigm. Analyzing engineers{\textquoteright} reaction to a newly introduced paradigm through the lens of cognitive psychology may highlight potential barriers to the paradigms{\textquoteright} successful adoption and use. In this position paper we demonstrate the potential benefit of the above-proposed approach via a case study focusing on the paradigm of inconsistency management. We present our findings, based on in-depth interviews with 20 practitioners, and analyze them using the dual-process theory, highlighting a clear clash between their intuition and the paradigm{\textquoteright}s rationale.",
keywords = "Cognitive processes, Dual-process theory, Inconsistency management, Paradigm acceptance",
author = "Irit Hadar and Anna Zamansky",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015.; 2nd International Workshop on Advances in Services Design based on the Notion of Capabiliy, ASDENCA 2015, 3rd International Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Information Systems Engineering, COGNISE 2015, 1st International Workshop on Digital Business In... ; Conference date: 08-06-2015 Through 09-06-2015",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-19243-7_11",
language = "American English",
series = "Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
pages = "107--113",
editor = "Anne Persson and Janis Stirna",
booktitle = "Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops - CAiSE 2015 International Workshops, Proceedings",
address = "Germany",
}