TY - JOUR
T1 - What do students do when asked to diagnose their mistakes? Does it help them? I. An atypical quiz context
AU - Yerushalmi, Edit
AU - Cohen, Elisheva
AU - Mason, Andrew
AU - Singh, Chandralekha
N1 - University of Pittsburgh; Weizmann Institute of Science, Department of Science Teaching; Israel Science Foundation [1283/05]; National Science Foundation [DUE-0442087]We wish to thank Professor Jeremy Levy, the physics faculty member who gave his valuable class time to participate in this study. We thank Yetty Varon, the statistician of the Science Teaching Department at The Weizmann Institute of Science, for her help in analyzing the data. We appreciate the support of the University of Pittsburgh and The Weizmann Institute of Science, Department of Science Teaching. This work was primarily supported by Israel Science Foundation Grant No. 1283/05 and National Science Foundation Grant No. DUE-0442087.
PY - 2012/9/21
Y1 - 2012/9/21
N2 - "Self-diagnosis tasks" are aimed at fostering diagnostic behavior by explicitly requiring students to present diagnosis as part of the activity of reviewing their problem solutions. Recitation groups in an introductory physics class of about 200 college students were distributed into a control group and three intervention groups in which different levels of guidance were provided for performing self-diagnosis activities. We investigated how well students self-diagnose their solutions in the different interventions and examined the effect of students' self-diagnosis on subsequent problem solving in the different intervention groups. We found that in the context of an atypical quiz, while external support altered the self-diagnosis performance, the self-diagnosis score was not correlated with subsequent problem-solving performance on a transfer problem. We discuss possible explanations for our findings.
AB - "Self-diagnosis tasks" are aimed at fostering diagnostic behavior by explicitly requiring students to present diagnosis as part of the activity of reviewing their problem solutions. Recitation groups in an introductory physics class of about 200 college students were distributed into a control group and three intervention groups in which different levels of guidance were provided for performing self-diagnosis activities. We investigated how well students self-diagnose their solutions in the different interventions and examined the effect of students' self-diagnosis on subsequent problem solving in the different intervention groups. We found that in the context of an atypical quiz, while external support altered the self-diagnosis performance, the self-diagnosis score was not correlated with subsequent problem-solving performance on a transfer problem. We discuss possible explanations for our findings.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867021910&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020109
DO - https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020109
M3 - مقالة
SN - 1554-9178
VL - 8
JO - Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research
JF - Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research
IS - 2
M1 - 020109
ER -