Abstract
In this article, we analyze the European Union's (EU) approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, showing that there is a wide gap between its normative opposition to the occupation, Israel's expanding settlement project, and the EU's foreign trade policy. Our argument is not only that there is no evidence of norm diffusion from the EU to Israel, but that within the EU itself there is no diffusion from the normative political stance to the EU's economic interests. The Israeli case suggests that the pro-democracy activists of Tunisia, Egypt, and Syria should be aware that the trade interests of the EU Member States will ultimately trump the EU's political declarations.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 100-119 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Democracy and Security |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 1-2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2013 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- EU Foreign and Security Policy
- EU-Israeli Relations
- Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
- Middle East Peace Process
- Normative Power Europe
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Sociology and Political Science
- Safety Research
- Political Science and International Relations
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What Can Pro-Democracy Activists in Arab Countries Expect from the European Union? Lessons from the Union's Relations with Israel'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver