Abstract
The goal of this study is to evaluate the effect of ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBFS) status (i.e., “waste” or “a by-product”) on (i) the selection of the best GGBFS concrete, in terms of the environmental impact, and (ii) the relationship between environmental damage intensity (EDI) and compressive strength (CS) for both high-and normal-strength concretes. The best GGBFS concretes, as well as the relationships between EDI and CS, are controversial with respect to different GGBFS statuses. In particular, for high-strength concretes, replacement of the waste status with the by-product status for GGBFS has the opposite influence on the selection of the best GGBFS concrete (in terms of the environment). For high-and normal-strength concretes, if GGBFS is considered as waste, then no consistent relationship between EDI and CS is found, whereas if GGBFS is considered as a by-product, then a relationship is observed between increased CS and decreased EDI.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 743-750 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2017 |
Keywords
- Blended cement concretes
- By-product status
- Sustainability
- Waste status
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Environmental Science
- Civil and Structural Engineering
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Waste and By-Product status of slag and concrete environmental damage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver