Abstract
We determine the scoring rule that is most likely to select a high-ability candidate. A major result is that neither the widely used plurality rule nor the inverse-plurality rule are ever optimal, and that the Borda rule is hardly ever optimal. Furthermore, we show that only the almost-plurality, the almost-inverse-plurality, and the almost-Borda rule can be optimal. Which of the “almost” rules is optimal depends on the likelihood that a candidate has high ability and how likely committee members are to correctly identify the abilities of the different candidates.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 129-151 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Group Decision and Negotiation |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Feb 2018 |
Keywords
- Committee decisions
- Scoring rules
- “Almost” voting rules
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Decision Sciences
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- Management of Technology and Innovation
- General Social Sciences
- Strategy and Management