TY - JOUR
T1 - Using what's there
T2 - Bilinguals adaptively rely on orthographic and color cues to achieve language control
AU - Fadlon, Julie
AU - Li, Chuchu
AU - Prior, Anat
AU - Gollan, Tamar H.
N1 - Funding Information: We thank Aya Meltzer-Asscher for her notes during the development of the Hebrew stimuli, and Rosa Montoya, Mayra Murillo, Razan Silawi and Lynn Cohen for their assistance in data collection and coding. None. Informed consent was obtained for experimentation with human subjects. This work was supported by a National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders grant 011492, a National Science Foundation grant 1457159, Edmond J. Safra Center for the Study of Learning Disabilities (Faculty of Education, University of Haifa), and an Israeli Science Foundation grant 1094/14. Funding Information: This work was supported by a National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders grant 011492 , a National Science Foundation grant 1457159 , Edmond J. Safra Center for the Study of Learning Disabilities (Faculty of Education, University of Haifa), and an Israeli Science Foundation grant 1094/14 . Publisher Copyright: © 2019 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2019/10
Y1 - 2019/10
N2 - We examined if bilinguals of two different language combinations can rely on novel and arbitrary cues to facilitate switching between languages in a read-aloud task. Spanish-English (Experiment 1) and Hebrew-English (Experiment 2) bilinguals read aloud mixed-language paragraphs, known to induce language intrusion errors (e.g., saying el instead of the), to test if intrusion rates are affected by: language combination, color-cues, language dominance, and part of speech. For Spanish-English bilinguals, written input is not rich in visual cues to language membership, whereas for Hebrew-English bilinguals rich cues are present (i.e., the two languages have different orthographies and are read in opposite directions). Hebrew-English bilinguals made fewer intrusion errors than Spanish-English bilinguals, and color cues significantly reduced intrusions on switches to the dominant language but not to the nondominant language, to the same extent in both bilingual populations. These results reveal powerful effects of visual cues for facilitating production of language switches, and illustrate that switching mechanisms are highly adaptable and sensitive, in that they can both recruit language- and orthography-specific cues when available and also rapidly exploit novel arbitrary cues to language membership when these are afforded. Finally, such incidental, experimentally induced cues, were recruited even in the presence of other already powerful cues, when task demands were high.
AB - We examined if bilinguals of two different language combinations can rely on novel and arbitrary cues to facilitate switching between languages in a read-aloud task. Spanish-English (Experiment 1) and Hebrew-English (Experiment 2) bilinguals read aloud mixed-language paragraphs, known to induce language intrusion errors (e.g., saying el instead of the), to test if intrusion rates are affected by: language combination, color-cues, language dominance, and part of speech. For Spanish-English bilinguals, written input is not rich in visual cues to language membership, whereas for Hebrew-English bilinguals rich cues are present (i.e., the two languages have different orthographies and are read in opposite directions). Hebrew-English bilinguals made fewer intrusion errors than Spanish-English bilinguals, and color cues significantly reduced intrusions on switches to the dominant language but not to the nondominant language, to the same extent in both bilingual populations. These results reveal powerful effects of visual cues for facilitating production of language switches, and illustrate that switching mechanisms are highly adaptable and sensitive, in that they can both recruit language- and orthography-specific cues when available and also rapidly exploit novel arbitrary cues to language membership when these are afforded. Finally, such incidental, experimentally induced cues, were recruited even in the presence of other already powerful cues, when task demands were high.
KW - Adaptability
KW - Bilingualism
KW - Code-switching
KW - Language control
KW - Production
KW - Visual cues
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85069911580
U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.06.002
DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.06.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 31376660
SN - 0010-0277
VL - 191
JO - Cognition
JF - Cognition
M1 - 103990
ER -