Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Using Nonnaive Participants Can Reduce Effect Sizes

Jesse Chandler, Gabriele Paolacci, Eyal Peer, Pam Mueller, Kate A. Ratliff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Although researchers often assume their participants are naive to experimental materials, this is not always the case. We investigated how prior exposure to a task affects subsequent experimental results. Participants in this study completed the same set of 12 experimental tasks at two points in time, first as a part of the Many Labs replication project and again a few days, a week, or a month later. Effect sizes were markedly lower in the second wave than in the first. The reduction was most pronounced when participants were assigned to a different condition in the second wave. We discuss the methodological implications of these findings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1131-1139
Number of pages9
JournalPsychological Science
Volume26
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 16 Jul 2015

Keywords

  • effect sizes
  • judgment and decision making
  • nonnaïveté
  • open data
  • open materials
  • panel conditioning
  • repeated participation
  • research methods

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Using Nonnaive Participants Can Reduce Effect Sizes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this