TY - GEN
T1 - Using Autoencoders to Denoise Cross-Session Non-Stationarity in EEG-Based Motor-Imagery Brain-Computer Interfaces
AU - Almagor, Ophir
AU - Avin, Ofer
AU - Rosipal, Roman
AU - Shriki, Oren
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 IEEE.
PY - 2022/1/1
Y1 - 2022/1/1
N2 - A major problem in brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) relates to the non-stationarity of brain signals. Consequently, the performance of a classification algorithm trained for an individual subject on a certain day deteriorates during the following days. The traditional approach is to recalibrate the algorithm every session, limiting the wide use of BCIs. Here, we use an autoencoder convolutional neural network to identify a low dimensional representation of the EEG signals from the first day (or days) and show that this allows for stable decoding performance on the following days without resorting to recalibration. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the residual signals, namely the difference between the original and reconstructed EEG, can be used to accurately discriminate among different recording sessions. In line with that, the reconstructed EEG cannot be used to discriminate among recording sessions. This implies that the reconstructed EEG reflects an invariant representation of the subject's intent, whereas the residual signals reflect a non-stationary component, which differs from one session to another. The findings are demonstrated through two different datasets.
AB - A major problem in brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) relates to the non-stationarity of brain signals. Consequently, the performance of a classification algorithm trained for an individual subject on a certain day deteriorates during the following days. The traditional approach is to recalibrate the algorithm every session, limiting the wide use of BCIs. Here, we use an autoencoder convolutional neural network to identify a low dimensional representation of the EEG signals from the first day (or days) and show that this allows for stable decoding performance on the following days without resorting to recalibration. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the residual signals, namely the difference between the original and reconstructed EEG, can be used to accurately discriminate among different recording sessions. In line with that, the reconstructed EEG cannot be used to discriminate among recording sessions. This implies that the reconstructed EEG reflects an invariant representation of the subject's intent, whereas the residual signals reflect a non-stationary component, which differs from one session to another. The findings are demonstrated through two different datasets.
KW - autoencoders
KW - brain-computer interface
KW - deep learning
KW - electroencephalogram
KW - motor-imagery
KW - non-stationarity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85153388419&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/Informatics57926.2022.10083486
DO - 10.1109/Informatics57926.2022.10083486
M3 - Conference contribution
T3 - 2022 IEEE 16th International Scientific Conference on Informatics, Informatics 2022 - Proceedings
SP - 24
EP - 28
BT - 2022 IEEE 16th International Scientific Conference on Informatics, Informatics 2022 - Proceedings
A2 - Steingartner, William
A2 - Korecko, Stefan
A2 - Szakal, Aniko
T2 - 16th IEEE International Scientific Conference on Informatics, Informatics 2022
Y2 - 23 November 2022 through 25 November 2022
ER -