Trumped by traditional hazards: EDC exposure from recycled wastewater compared to other water related risks in developed and developing nations

Vivian Futran Fuhrman, Alon Tal, Alfred Abed-Rabbo, Nader el-Khateeb, Nina Gordon-Kirsch, Tal Godinger, Wa'd Odeh, Shai Arnon

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Israel is the global leader in wastewater reuse making it the ideal test case to investigate human exposure to contaminants via recycled wastewater pathways. Studies around the world have revealed that wastewater frequently contains endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) that are not completely removed by traditional treatment. As these compounds can harm ecological and human health, it was initially hypothesized that residual EDCs were contributing to reproductive problems in Israel's population. The fate of EDCs from wastewater effluent in Israel and the Palestinian West Bank's shared water basins was assessed over a two year period, and the associated health risks and economic costs of competing wastewater treatment options evaluated. Results from this analysis can inform both developed and developing nations since Israel highly treats and reuses most of its wastewater while only a small percent of sewage undergoes any treatment in the Palestinian territories. EDCs in the region's aquatic environment were measured at concentrations consistent with global averages. According to modeling results, human exposure to bisphenol A via recycled wastewater is likely small compared to ingestion through food. While a potential health risk was identified from bisphenol A in recycled wastewater, it was most pronounced in extreme exposure situations and when reproductive capacity was already compromised. In the West Bank, a costeffectiveness analysis determined that the marginal improvement in removal rates of estrogens from building tertiary versus secondary level wastewater treatment facilities would not justify the added cost to the Palestinian Authority. Secondary treatment of sewage removed EDCs sufficiently, and the money saved by not investing in tertiary treatment could be better used to provide more essential sanitation services. Tertiary treatment produces other important environmental benefits in which countries like Israel may wish to invest, but it yields only marginally better EDC removal, so developed countries aiming to reduce overall EDC exposure should target sources other than treated wastewater. These findings suggest that EDCs from treated wastewater merit continued research, and demonstrate the importance of environmental cooperation in regions with bifurcated development. However, as EDCs are not the biggest risk to human health in developed or developing nations at this time, they should not be the primary driver for policy governing wastewater management.

Original languageAmerican English
Title of host publicationEndocrine Disrupting Chemicals
Subtitle of host publicationOccurrence, Exposures and Health Risks
EditorsSabrina Johnston
PublisherNova Science Publisher Inc.
Chapter2
Pages61-110
Number of pages50
Edition1st
ISBN (Electronic)9781634852470
ISBN (Print)9781634852319
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2016

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation
    SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
  3. SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
    SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
  4. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
  5. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
    SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trumped by traditional hazards: EDC exposure from recycled wastewater compared to other water related risks in developed and developing nations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this