Abstract
Traversing psychological distance involves going beyond direct experience, and includes planning, perspective taking, and contemplating counterfactuals. Consistent with this view, temporal, spatial, and social distances as well as hypotheticality are associated, affect each other, and are inferred from one another. Moreover, traversing all distances involves the use of abstraction, which we define as forming a belief about the substitutability for a specific purpose of subjectively distinct objects. Indeed, across many instances of both abstraction and psychological distancing, more abstract constructs are used for more distal objects. Here, we describe the implications of this relation for prediction, choice, communication, negotiation, and self-control. We ask whether traversing distance is a general mental ability and whether distance should replace expectancy in expected-utility theories.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 364-369 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Trends in Cognitive Sciences |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 2014 |
Keywords
- Abstraction
- Construal level theory
- Psychological distance
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Traversing psychological distance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver