TY - GEN
T1 - Trading Query Complexity for Sample-Based Testing and Multi-testing Scalability
AU - Fischer, Eldar
AU - Lachish, Oded
AU - Vasudev, Yadu
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2015 IEEE.
PY - 2015/12/11
Y1 - 2015/12/11
N2 - We show that every non-adaptive property testing algorithm making a constant number of queries, over a fixed alphabet, can be converted to a sample-based (as per [Gold Reich and Ron, 2015]) testing algorithm whose average number of queries is a fixed, smaller than 1, power of n. Since the query distribution of the sample-based algorithm is not dependent at all on the property, or the original algorithm, this has many implications in scenarios where there are many properties that need to be tested for concurrently, such as testing (relatively large) unions of properties, or converting a Merlin-Arthur Proximity proof (as per [Gur and Rothblum, 2013]) to a proper testing algorithm. The proof method involves preparing the original testing algorithm for a combinatorial analysis. For the analysis we develop a structural lemma for hyper graphs that may be of independent interest. When analyzing a hyper graph that was extracted from a 2-sided test, it allows for finding generalized sunflowers that provide for a large-deviation type analysis. For 1-sided tests the bounds can be improved further by applying Janson's inequality directly over our structures.
AB - We show that every non-adaptive property testing algorithm making a constant number of queries, over a fixed alphabet, can be converted to a sample-based (as per [Gold Reich and Ron, 2015]) testing algorithm whose average number of queries is a fixed, smaller than 1, power of n. Since the query distribution of the sample-based algorithm is not dependent at all on the property, or the original algorithm, this has many implications in scenarios where there are many properties that need to be tested for concurrently, such as testing (relatively large) unions of properties, or converting a Merlin-Arthur Proximity proof (as per [Gur and Rothblum, 2013]) to a proper testing algorithm. The proof method involves preparing the original testing algorithm for a combinatorial analysis. For the analysis we develop a structural lemma for hyper graphs that may be of independent interest. When analyzing a hyper graph that was extracted from a 2-sided test, it allows for finding generalized sunflowers that provide for a large-deviation type analysis. For 1-sided tests the bounds can be improved further by applying Janson's inequality directly over our structures.
KW - hypergraphs
KW - property testing
KW - sampling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960361024&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/FOCS.2015.75
DO - 10.1109/FOCS.2015.75
M3 - منشور من مؤتمر
T3 - Proceedings - Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS
SP - 1163
EP - 1182
BT - Proceedings - 2015 IEEE 56th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2015
T2 - 56th IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2015
Y2 - 17 October 2015 through 20 October 2015
ER -