Towards Computational Foreseeability

Sarit Kraus, Kayla Boggess, Robert Kim, Bryan H. Choi, Lu Feng

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

This paper addresses the challenges of computational accountability in autonomous systems, particularly in Autonomous Vehicles (AVs), where safety and efficiency often conflict. We begin by examining current approaches such as cost minimization, reward maximization, human-centered approaches, and ethical frameworks, noting their limitations addressing these challenges. Foreseeability is a central concept in tort law that limits the accountability and legal liability of an actor to a reasonable scope. Yet, current data-driven methods to determine foreseeability are rigid, ignore uncertainty, and depend on simulation data. In this work, we advocate for a new computational approach to establish foreseeability of autonomous systems based on the legal “BPL” formula. We provide open research challenges, using fully autonomous vehicles as a motivating example, and call for researchers to help autonomous systems make accountable decisions in safety-critical scenarios.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSpecial Track on AI Alignment
EditorsToby Walsh, Julie Shah, Zico Kolter
Pages28586-28593
Number of pages8
Edition27
ISBN (Electronic)157735897X, 9781577358978
DOIs
StatePublished - 11 Apr 2025
Event39th Annual AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2025 - Philadelphia, United States
Duration: 25 Feb 20254 Mar 2025

Publication series

NameProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Number27
Volume39

Conference

Conference39th Annual AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2025
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityPhiladelphia
Period25/02/254/03/25

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Artificial Intelligence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Towards Computational Foreseeability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this