Threatened or Threatening? How Ideology shapes asylum seekers' Immigration policy attitudes in Israel and Australia

Daphna Canetti, Kerenl G. Snider, Anne Pedersen, Brian J. Hall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Can different political ideologies explain policy preferences regarding asylum seekers? We focus on attitudes regarding governmental policy towards out-group members and suggest that perceptions of threat help to shape these policy attitudes. Study 1 compared public opinion regarding asylum policy in Israel (N = 137) and Australia (N = 138), two countries with restrictive asylum policies and who host a large number of asylum seekers; Study 2, a longitudinal study, was conducted during two different time periods in Israel-before and during the Gaza conflict. Results of both studies showed that threat perceptions of out-group members drive the relationship between conservative political ideologies and support for exclusionary asylum policies among citizens. Perceptions of threat held by members of the host country (the in-group) towards asylum seekers (the out-group) may influence policy formation. The effect of these out-groups threats needs to be critically weighed when considering Israeli and Australian policies towards asylum seekers.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)583-606
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Refugee Studies
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2016

Keywords

  • Asylum policy
  • conflict
  • perception of threats

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Threatened or Threatening? How Ideology shapes asylum seekers' Immigration policy attitudes in Israel and Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this