Abstract
Despite multiple uses, the concept of provocation is undertheorized and underinvestigated. Theorizing provocation narratives as communication strategies, this article shows that what is at stake in provocations are crucial issues of intentionality, accountability, and blame. While some provocations elicit reactions that are beneficial to the parties involved, others may incite violence. The second part of our study focuses on the latter because of their potential for shifting blame to victims. To deconstruct the mechanism by which provocation introduces this type of bias, we use Labov's method of narrative analysis and apply it to two news items. We conclude on how provocation can serve as a theoretical framework and methodological tool for narrative analysis in many communication contexts and fields.
| Original language | English GB |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 329-346 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Communication Theory |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 2017 |
Keywords
- Bias
- Blaming
- Communication Strategy
- Labov
- Narrative
- Provocation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Communication
- Language and Linguistics
- Linguistics and Language
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Theorizing Provocation Narratives as Communication Strategies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver