Abstract
In our focal article (Ferdman & Sagiv, 2012), we suggested that increased dialogue and connection between researchers and practitioners focused on diversity in organizations and those focused on cross-cultural work psychology could be beneficial to growth and advancement in both fields. The thoughtful and intriguing commentaries to the article are heterogeneous both in the topics they focus on and in their relative emphasis on theory versus practice, and in our view support our call for more dialogue. In this response, we address some of the key issues the commentaries stimulated for us, including the notion of integration versus homogenization and the differential role of values in research in each field. We summarize by highlighting, as did many of the commentaries, the importance of multiple and diverse approaches and perspectives, a value consistent with both fields.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 373-379 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Industrial and Organizational Psychology |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2012 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology
- Applied Psychology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Value of Connecting Diversity in Organizations and Cross-Cultural Work Psychology Through Dialogue and Multiplicity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver