Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Uniformisation of Monadic Second-Order Logic over Countable Ordinals

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

Abstract

We study the uniformisation problem for monadic second-order logic (MSO) over countable ordinal chains. Given a formula defining a relation between subsets of the input structure, the question is whether there exists a formula that defines a function selecting, for every set in the domain of the relation, a unique set such that the pair belongs to the relation. It is known, due to Lifsches and Shelah [9], that MSO cannot, in general, be uniformised over the class of countable ordinals. We show that the maximal uniformisation degree is reached by extending the logic with a predicate that, given a set, selects (when possible) a cofinal subset of order type ω. Equivalently, every MSO formula can be uniformised over the class of countable ordinal chains using a formula in this extended logic.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication41st Annual Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, LICS 2026
EditorsFaggian Claudia, Katoen Joost-Pieter
PublisherSchloss Dagstuhl- Leibniz-Zentrum fur Informatik GmbH, Dagstuhl Publishing
ISBN (Electronic)9783959774345
DOIs
StatePublished - 29 Jul 2026
Event41st Annual Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, LICS 2026 - Lisbon, Portugal
Duration: 20 Jul 2026 → 23 Jul 2026

Publication series

NameLeibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs
Volume380

Conference

Conference41st Annual Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, LICS 2026
Country/TerritoryPortugal
CityLisbon
Period20/07/26 → 23/07/26

Keywords

  • Monadic second-order logic
  • chains
  • composition method
  • factorization trees
  • ordinals
  • uniformisation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Uniformisation of Monadic Second-Order Logic over Countable Ordinals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this