Abstract
Based on focus groups and interviews with student renters in an Israeli slum, the article explores the contributions of differences in sonic styles and sensibilities to boundary work, social categorization, and evaluation. Alongside visual cues such as broken windows, bad neighborhoods are characterized by sonic cues, such as shouts from windows. Students understand “being ghetto” as being loud in a particular way and use loudness as a central resource in their boundary work. Loudness is read as a performative index of class and ethnicity, and the performance of middle-class studentship entails being appalled by stigmatized sonic practices and participating in their exoticization. However, the sonic is not merely yet another resource of boundary work. Paying sociological attention to senses other than vision reveals complex interactions between structures anchored in the body, structures anchored in language, and actors’ identification strategies, which may refine theorizations of the body and the senses in social theory.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 205-242 |
| Number of pages | 38 |
| Journal | American Journal of Sociology |
| Volume | 121 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jul 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Sociology and Political Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The sound of stigmatization: Sonic habitus, sonic styles, and boundary work in an urban slum'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver