Abstract
Animals’ cognitive processes are shaped by the challenges they face in their environments over developmental and evolutionary time, but cognitive studies are often disconnected from these challenges. Here, we argue that a failure to ground research in natural history can inadvertently misdirect research efforts and make results difficult to interpret. We highlight these potential pitfalls using a series of case studies and consider how field research, ecologically informed lab studies and formal theory can offer potential solutions. Animal cognition research is entering an exciting new phase, with technological advances providing opportunities to tackle previously intractable questions, both in the lab and in the wild, while mathematical models are increasingly helping to strengthen the field's theoretical foundations. Placing natural history at the centre of this work will be crucial to ensure that we capitalise on these advances to build a robust understanding of the proximate and ultimate basis of animal cognition.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 101154 |
| Journal | Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences |
| Volume | 46 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2022 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Behavioral Neuroscience