Abstract
The immigration debate in political theory has produced a series of accounts that justify the state’s right to exclude potential immigrants, where the right of self-determination figures prominently. We challenge two prominent accounts of the self-determination-based right to exclude and defend a circumscribed right to exclude and a corollary duty to admit immigrants, based on our ‘people relationship goods’ account of self-determination. Our conception reconciles the moral claims of global opportunity migrants with the well-being and non-alienation interests of the locals. It therefore provides a principled answer to the philosophical question underlying pressing political conflicts today, namely what is the permissible scope of exclusion by self-determining political communities, in light of weighty global moral demands of inclusion.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 483-511 |
| Number of pages | 29 |
| Journal | Journal of Moral Philosophy |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 5-6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- global equality of opportunity
- non-alienation
- people relationship goods
- right to exclude
- self-determination
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Right to Exclude and the Duty to Include: Self-determination, Equal Opportunity, and Immigration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver