TY - JOUR
T1 - The Provocative Effect of Law
T2 - Majority Nationalism and Minority Discrimination
AU - Barak-Corren, Netta
AU - Feldman, Yuval
AU - Gidron, Noam
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2018 Cornell Law School and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2018/12
Y1 - 2018/12
N2 - Western societies have experienced ethnic and religious diversification in recent decades. These demographic changes have been met by efforts to defend the local dominant culture using majority nationalism laws, intended to protect the cultural heritage of the majority. We empirically examine majority nationalism laws’ expressive effects on patterns of minority discrimination using the Israeli draft Nation Law (NL) as a case study. Drawing on two experimental surveys of a representative sample of the majority population of Israel (N = 602), our results lend weak support to the hypothesis that majority nationalism laws increase bias against minorities, and modest support to the hypothesis that such laws generate unintended spillover effects across different minority groups and from the public to the private sphere. Our main finding is that majority nationalism laws provoke a backlash reaction from those who oppose them. We define this as the provocative effect of law and discuss its relation to the expressive law theory. The results suggest that the effects of majority nationalism laws may vary systematically across ideological groups and spheres of discrimination.
AB - Western societies have experienced ethnic and religious diversification in recent decades. These demographic changes have been met by efforts to defend the local dominant culture using majority nationalism laws, intended to protect the cultural heritage of the majority. We empirically examine majority nationalism laws’ expressive effects on patterns of minority discrimination using the Israeli draft Nation Law (NL) as a case study. Drawing on two experimental surveys of a representative sample of the majority population of Israel (N = 602), our results lend weak support to the hypothesis that majority nationalism laws increase bias against minorities, and modest support to the hypothesis that such laws generate unintended spillover effects across different minority groups and from the public to the private sphere. Our main finding is that majority nationalism laws provoke a backlash reaction from those who oppose them. We define this as the provocative effect of law and discuss its relation to the expressive law theory. The results suggest that the effects of majority nationalism laws may vary systematically across ideological groups and spheres of discrimination.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054379691&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12199
DO - https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12199
M3 - Article
SN - 1740-1453
VL - 15
SP - 951
EP - 986
JO - Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
JF - Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
IS - 4
ER -