Abstract
We argue that in current spacetime physics there can be no dynamical derivation of primitive geometrical notions such as length. We illustrate our argument by focusing on two case studies: the special theory of relativity and some approaches to quantum gravity, and we argue that in these cases, some geometrical notions are assumed rather than derived. Our argument suggests a new reading of Einstein's views on the status of geometry vs. dynamics.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 357-364 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2013 |
Keywords
- Dynamics
- Emergence
- Geometry
- Length
- Lorentz-invariance
- Spacetime
- Special relativity
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- History
- General Physics and Astronomy
- History and Philosophy of Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The primacy of geometry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver