Abstract
This essay develops a contractarian response to Jeff McMahan's critique of the traditional war convention. Contractarianism asserts, first, that an outcome in which the current war convention is accepted is better for all relevant parties than any other feasible outcome; second, that the war convention is fair; third, that soldiers accept the existing convention; fourth, that soldiers' acceptance of the convention equalizes their moral status within wars vis-a'vis each other. The essay addresses McMahan's powerful objections to each of the above statements.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 43-73 |
Number of pages | 31 |
Journal | Ethics |
Volume | 122 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 2011 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy