TY - JOUR
T1 - The Moderately Efficient Enzyme
T2 - Futile Encounters and Enzyme Floppiness
AU - Bar-Even, Arren
AU - Milo, Ron
AU - Noor, Elad
AU - Tawfik, Dan
N1 - We thank Mikael Elias and Avi Flamholz for insightful discussions and Devin Trudeau for feedback on the manuscript. We are grateful to Don Hilvert for his highly insightful comments regarding our model and hypotheses. Financial support to D.S.T. by DTRA (HDTRA1-11-C-0026) and the Estate of Mark Scher and to R.M. by the European Research Council (260392, Project SYMPAC), Israel Science Foundation (Grant 750/09), and the Helmsley Charitable Foundation is gratefully acknowledged. R.M. is the Charles and Louise Gartner professional chair. E.N. is supported by an EMBO postdoctoral fellowship. D.S.T. is the Nella and Leon Benoziyo Professor of Biochemistry.
PY - 2015/8/18
Y1 - 2015/8/18
N2 - The pioneering model of Henri, Michaelis, and Menten was based on the fast equilibrium assumption: the substrate binds its enzyme reversibly, and substrate dissociation is much faster than product formation. Here, we examine this assumption from a somewhat different point of view, asking what fraction of enzyme–substrate complexes are futile, i.e., result in dissociation rather than product formation. In Knowles’ notion of a “perfect” enzyme, all encounters of the enzyme with its substrate result in conversion to product. Thus, the perfect enzyme’s catalytic efficiency, kcat/KM, is constrained by only the diffusion on-rate, and the fraction of futile encounters (defined as φ) approaches zero. The available data on >1000 different enzymes suggest that for ≥90% of enzymes φ > 0.99 and for the “average enzyme” φ ≥ 0.9999; namely, <1 of 104 encounters is productive. Thus, the “fast equilibrium” assumption holds for the vast majority of enzymes. We discuss possible molecular origins for the dominance of futile encounters, including the coexistence of multiple sub-states of an enzyme’s active site (enzyme floppiness) and/or its substrate. Floppiness relates to the inherent flexibility of proteins, but also to conflicting demands, or trade-offs, between rate acceleration (the rate-determining chemical step) and catalytic turnover, or between turnover rate and accuracy. The study of futile encounters and active-site floppiness may contribute to a better understanding of enzyme catalysis, enzyme evolution, and improved enzyme design.
AB - The pioneering model of Henri, Michaelis, and Menten was based on the fast equilibrium assumption: the substrate binds its enzyme reversibly, and substrate dissociation is much faster than product formation. Here, we examine this assumption from a somewhat different point of view, asking what fraction of enzyme–substrate complexes are futile, i.e., result in dissociation rather than product formation. In Knowles’ notion of a “perfect” enzyme, all encounters of the enzyme with its substrate result in conversion to product. Thus, the perfect enzyme’s catalytic efficiency, kcat/KM, is constrained by only the diffusion on-rate, and the fraction of futile encounters (defined as φ) approaches zero. The available data on >1000 different enzymes suggest that for ≥90% of enzymes φ > 0.99 and for the “average enzyme” φ ≥ 0.9999; namely, <1 of 104 encounters is productive. Thus, the “fast equilibrium” assumption holds for the vast majority of enzymes. We discuss possible molecular origins for the dominance of futile encounters, including the coexistence of multiple sub-states of an enzyme’s active site (enzyme floppiness) and/or its substrate. Floppiness relates to the inherent flexibility of proteins, but also to conflicting demands, or trade-offs, between rate acceleration (the rate-determining chemical step) and catalytic turnover, or between turnover rate and accuracy. The study of futile encounters and active-site floppiness may contribute to a better understanding of enzyme catalysis, enzyme evolution, and improved enzyme design.
U2 - 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00621
DO - 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00621
M3 - مقالة
SN - 0006-2960
VL - 54
SP - 4969
EP - 4977
JO - Biochemistry
JF - Biochemistry
IS - 32
ER -