Abstract
In 1915, a Denver murder case became a national story, not because of the identities of the perpetrator or victim but because of a reluctant trial witness: Judge Ben B. Lindsey. A pioneer of Progressive Era juvenile justice, Lindsey was charged with contempt of court for refusing to disclose the details that a twelve-year-old boy shared with him. His refusal led to a six-year-long battle over ideas of confidence and secrecy between a juvenile court judge and a minor. This article analyzes the murder trial and consequent contempt of court case as reflective of a clash over questions of law, justice, and public interest and highlights the role of ordinary people, including children, in debating these ideas. It argues that, as legal actors engaged in a conflict between legal formalism and socialized law, members of the public debated their own perceptions and vernacular understandings of law, justice, and the role of the juvenile court.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 440-470 |
| Number of pages | 31 |
| Journal | Law and Social Inquiry |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 May 2026 |
Keywords
- children
- juvenile court
- priviledged communication
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Social Sciences
- Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Judge Is “No Snitch”: A Progressive Era Collision between Juvenile Justice and Criminal Law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver