The impact of the mode of thought in complex decisions: Intuitive decisions are better

Marius Usher, Zohar Russo, Mark Weyers, Ran Brauner, Dan Zakay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A number of recent studies have reported that decision quality is enhanced under conditions of inattention or distraction (unconscious thought; Dijksterhuis, 2004; Dijksterhuis and Nordgren, 2006; Dijksterhuis et al., 2006). These reports have generated considerable controversy, for both experimental (problems of replication) and theoretical reasons (interpretation). Here we report the results of four experiments. The first experiment replicates the unconscious thought effect, under conditions that validate and control the subjective criterion of decision quality. The second and third experiments examine the impact of a mode of thought manipulation (without distraction) on decision quality in immediate decisions. Here we find that intuitive or affective manipulations improve decision quality compared to analytic/deliberation manipulations. The fourth experiment combines the two methods (distraction and mode of thought manipulations) and demonstrates enhanced decision quality, in a situation that attempts to preserve ecological validity. The results are interpreted within a framework that is based on two interacting subsystems of decisionmaking: an affective/intuition based system and an analytic/deliberation system.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberArticle 37
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume2
Issue numberMAR
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Keywords

  • Affect
  • Complex decisions
  • Distraction
  • Implicit learning
  • Intuition
  • Two-system theory

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of the mode of thought in complex decisions: Intuitive decisions are better'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this