TY - JOUR
T1 - The impact of colonoscopy indication on polyp detection rate
AU - Baker, Fadi Abu
AU - Mari, Amir
AU - Hosadurg, Deepash
AU - Suki, Muhammed
AU - Ovadia, Baruch
AU - Gal, Oren
AU - Kopelamn, Yael
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2019, Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/5/3
Y1 - 2019/5/3
N2 - Background Adenoma/polyp detection rates are considered to be among the most important quality indicators of colonoscopy and are key measures of a quality procedure. However, they are designed for use in the screening setting and are not amenable to other colonoscopy indications. Little is known about their significance in other colonoscopy indications. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the various indications on polyp detection rate (PDR). Methods This was a retrospective, single-center study. Electronic reports of index colonoscopy procedures with adequate bowel preparation over a 10-year period were reviewed. Patients were divided into 7 groups based on the study indication. PDR was determined for each group and was compared to that of a control group, the screening indication group. Adjustment was made for potential confounders such as age, sex, and procedural setting. Results A total of 13,054 patients were considered suitable for the study. PDR was greatest in the positive fecal occult blood test group, with a value of 33.1% (P<0.01). Overall, the remaining groups showed similar PDRs compared with screening (22.1% vs. 20.4%; P=0.15). This trend persisted in a multivariate analysis, which showed the odds ratio in the positive fecal occult blood test group to be significantly higher, with a value of 1.955 (1.759-2.172, P<0.001) compared with the screening group. Conclusion PDR was highest for the positive fecal occult blood test indication, but was not affected significantly by most indications. Further randomized studies are warranted to confirm these findings and help calculate recommended thresholds for “overall” PDR.
AB - Background Adenoma/polyp detection rates are considered to be among the most important quality indicators of colonoscopy and are key measures of a quality procedure. However, they are designed for use in the screening setting and are not amenable to other colonoscopy indications. Little is known about their significance in other colonoscopy indications. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the various indications on polyp detection rate (PDR). Methods This was a retrospective, single-center study. Electronic reports of index colonoscopy procedures with adequate bowel preparation over a 10-year period were reviewed. Patients were divided into 7 groups based on the study indication. PDR was determined for each group and was compared to that of a control group, the screening indication group. Adjustment was made for potential confounders such as age, sex, and procedural setting. Results A total of 13,054 patients were considered suitable for the study. PDR was greatest in the positive fecal occult blood test group, with a value of 33.1% (P<0.01). Overall, the remaining groups showed similar PDRs compared with screening (22.1% vs. 20.4%; P=0.15). This trend persisted in a multivariate analysis, which showed the odds ratio in the positive fecal occult blood test group to be significantly higher, with a value of 1.955 (1.759-2.172, P<0.001) compared with the screening group. Conclusion PDR was highest for the positive fecal occult blood test indication, but was not affected significantly by most indications. Further randomized studies are warranted to confirm these findings and help calculate recommended thresholds for “overall” PDR.
KW - Non-screening colonoscopy
KW - Polyp detection rate
KW - Quality indicator
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068746978&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.20524/aog.2019.0374
DO - 10.20524/aog.2019.0374
M3 - مقالة
C2 - 31040625
SN - 1108-7471
VL - 32
SP - 278
EP - 282
JO - Annals of Gastroenterology
JF - Annals of Gastroenterology
IS - 3
ER -