The gender-race intersection and the ‘sheltering-effect’ of public-sector employment

Hadas Mandel, Moshe Semyonov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Seeking to understand the role played by labor market structure in affecting economic inequality, we examine the extent to which the public sector, as compared to the private sector, differentially employs and rewards women, Blacks and subgroups classified by race and gender (e.g., Black women, Black men). Analyzing data from the American Community Survey (2014–2015), we find that public-sector employment is more attractive for Blacks than for women; Blacks’ odds of becoming public-sector employees are much higher than those of Whites, regardless of gender. No evidence was found for the argument that gender interacts with race in affecting the tendency to work in the public sector. As for wages, despite recent trends pointing to a decline in the advantages of the public sector for Blacks, it is still found to be more protective of Blacks, men and women alike. The meaning of the findings and their implications are discussed in light of structural barriers of gender and race inequality.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100581
JournalResearch in Social Stratification and Mobility
Volume71
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 1 - No Poverty
    SDG 1 No Poverty
  2. SDG 5 - Gender Equality
    SDG 5 Gender Equality
  3. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
  4. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Keywords

  • Discrimination
  • Gender pay gap
  • Intersectionality
  • Public sector
  • Racial pay gap
  • Wage inequality

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The gender-race intersection and the ‘sheltering-effect’ of public-sector employment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this