The Feeling “Without Any Name”

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

In this commentary, I briefly present in chronological order several historical developments which can explain some of the confusions with respect to arousal that have become entrenched in the contemporary debate. These historical developments include: Immanuel Kant's eighteenth-century division of the affects into sthenic vs. asthenic; the emergence of modern conceptions of pleasure and displeasure in the West; the nineteenth-century alignment of pleasure and displeasure with “sthenic” and “asthenic” in psycho-physiology; the early-twentieth-century disruption of this nineteenth-century alignment; the establishment of a new-physiological order of emotions; and the emergence of “emotional excitement” as the new feeling of the new emotion order of physiology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)16-18
Number of pages3
JournalEmotion Review
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2025

Keywords

  • arousal
  • asthenic
  • displeasure
  • excitement
  • history of emotions
  • physiology of emotions
  • pleasure
  • psychophysiology
  • sthenic

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this