The disadvantageous but appealing use of visual guidance in procedural skills training

Nirit Yuviler-Gavish, Eldad Yechiam

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

The use of visual guidance tools in procedural tasks training is considered to improve performance. However, facilitating training with visual guidance tools may also impair skill transfer, because of the possibility of inhibiting active task exploration. The present work examined four different kinds of visual guidance tools which can facilitate training: visual pointing aid; visual pointing aid combined with drawing options; observational learning in the first pari of the training; and dyad trainer-trainee performance. These tools were examined by using a 3-D puzzle task and different training settings (computerized training, AR training, etc.). Three experimental studies demonstrate that although these tools were preferable for trainers and trainees, and required less cognitive load during training, they impaired non-supervised perfom1ance. These findings suggest that when designing training platforms, using sophisticated visual communication aids should be considered very carefully given their potentially negative effects on active exploration processes and training quality..

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAdvances in Cognitive Ergonomics
Pages764-773
Number of pages10
ISBN (Electronic)9781439834923
StatePublished - 19 Apr 2016

Keywords

  • Augmented reality
  • Procedural skills
  • Skills transfer
  • Training
  • Visual guidance

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Engineering
  • General Computer Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The disadvantageous but appealing use of visual guidance in procedural skills training'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this