Abstract
An underlying assumption in computational approaches in cognitive and brain sciences is that the nervous system is an input–output model of the world: Its input–output functions mirror certain relations in the target domains. I argue that the input–output modelling assumption plays distinct methodological and explanatory roles. Methodologically, input–output modelling serves to discover the computed function from environmental cues. Explanatorily, input–output modelling serves to account for the appropriateness of the computed function to the explanandum information-processing task. I compare very briefly the modelling explanation to mechanistic and optimality explanations, noting that in both cases the explanations can be seen as complementary rather than contrastive or competing.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 53-75 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Minds and Machines |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Mar 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Keywords
- Cognitive neuroscience
- Computational models
- Mechanistic explanations
- Modelling
- Optimality
- Representation
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy
- Artificial Intelligence
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Brain as an Input–Output Model of the World'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver