TY - JOUR
T1 - The “Bilingual Education” Policy in Xinjiang Revisited
T2 - New Evidence of Open Resistance and Active Support among the Uyghur Elite
AU - Baranovitch, Nimrod
N1 - Funding Information: I am grateful to Abduweli Ayup and several Uyghur informants who helped me with translation from Uyghur. The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2020.
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - The “bilingual education” policy in Xinjiang has been one of the most contentious policies implemented in the region in recent decades. Given its negative impact on one of the most important markers of Uyghur ethnic identity, it has been a major cause of Uyghur discontent. Nevertheless, our knowledge of the genesis of this policy and the negotiations that took place around its implementation has been partial at best. Through an in-depth analysis of two essays published in the early and mid-2000s by two prominent Uyghur scholars, a large body of academic publications by other Uyghur scholars, and ethnographic data collected since the early 2000s, this article reexamines part of the conventional academic wisdom that relates to this policy, particularly the role Uyghurs have played in relation to it. The article suggests two main revisions to the existing knowledge. One has to do with the amount and form of Uyghur resistance to the policy, and the other with the role Uyghurs have played in promoting the policy. I argue that at least in its early stages, not only did not all Uyghurs resist the policy, but also, in fact, part of the Uyghur political and academic elite played an active role in promoting it. In addition, contrary to the implicit agreement in the existing scholarship that Uyghurs could resist the policy only in covert forms, in fact a considerable number of Uyghur academics have been engaged for years in persistent and overt struggle against it.
AB - The “bilingual education” policy in Xinjiang has been one of the most contentious policies implemented in the region in recent decades. Given its negative impact on one of the most important markers of Uyghur ethnic identity, it has been a major cause of Uyghur discontent. Nevertheless, our knowledge of the genesis of this policy and the negotiations that took place around its implementation has been partial at best. Through an in-depth analysis of two essays published in the early and mid-2000s by two prominent Uyghur scholars, a large body of academic publications by other Uyghur scholars, and ethnographic data collected since the early 2000s, this article reexamines part of the conventional academic wisdom that relates to this policy, particularly the role Uyghurs have played in relation to it. The article suggests two main revisions to the existing knowledge. One has to do with the amount and form of Uyghur resistance to the policy, and the other with the role Uyghurs have played in promoting the policy. I argue that at least in its early stages, not only did not all Uyghurs resist the policy, but also, in fact, part of the Uyghur political and academic elite played an active role in promoting it. In addition, contrary to the implicit agreement in the existing scholarship that Uyghurs could resist the policy only in covert forms, in fact a considerable number of Uyghur academics have been engaged for years in persistent and overt struggle against it.
KW - Abdureop Polat Teklimakani
KW - Ilham Tohti
KW - Uyghurs
KW - Xinjiang
KW - bilingual education
KW - resistance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85094936780&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700420969135
DO - https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700420969135
M3 - Article
SN - 0097-7004
VL - 48
SP - 134
EP - 166
JO - Modern China
JF - Modern China
IS - 1
ER -