TY - JOUR
T1 - The Association BetweenMentalizing and Psychopathology
T2 - AMeta-Analysis of the Reading theMind in the Eyes Task Across Psychiatric Disorders
AU - Johnson, Benjamin N.
AU - Kivity, Yogev
AU - Rosenstein, Lia K.
AU - LeBreton, James M.
AU - Levy, Kenneth N.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 American Psychological Association
PY - 2022/11/10
Y1 - 2022/11/10
N2 - The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task (RMET) is commonly used to assess mentalizing, the capacity to make inferences about mental states. The RMET has been used to examine mentalizing across mental health disorders such as autism, schizophrenia, eating disorders, and schizotypal, borderline, and narcissistic personality disorders. In this meta-analysis, we examine differences in within-disorder associations between mentalizing and clinical correlates as a function of diagnosis to determine the strength of the relationship between mentalizing and dysfunction within these conditions. We analyzed 414 effect sizes from 54 studies including 12 different diagnostic groups. As expected, we found significant associations between total RMET score and clinical correlates in bipolar (r = -.32), psychosis (r = -.30), substance use disorders (r = -.25), autism spectrum disorder (r = -.21), and borderline personality disorder (r = -.21), though not in antisocial personality disorder (r = -.14). The average effect size among putative disorders of mentalizing (r = -.27) exceeded that of other disorders (r = -.09). Our findings suggest mentalizing deficits are implicated in the psychological functioning a range of psychiatric disorders, such as psychosis, autism, and borderline personality disorder. Our results also support using the RMET to predict important clinical manifestation among samples with these diagnostic characteristics.
AB - The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task (RMET) is commonly used to assess mentalizing, the capacity to make inferences about mental states. The RMET has been used to examine mentalizing across mental health disorders such as autism, schizophrenia, eating disorders, and schizotypal, borderline, and narcissistic personality disorders. In this meta-analysis, we examine differences in within-disorder associations between mentalizing and clinical correlates as a function of diagnosis to determine the strength of the relationship between mentalizing and dysfunction within these conditions. We analyzed 414 effect sizes from 54 studies including 12 different diagnostic groups. As expected, we found significant associations between total RMET score and clinical correlates in bipolar (r = -.32), psychosis (r = -.30), substance use disorders (r = -.25), autism spectrum disorder (r = -.21), and borderline personality disorder (r = -.21), though not in antisocial personality disorder (r = -.14). The average effect size among putative disorders of mentalizing (r = -.27) exceeded that of other disorders (r = -.09). Our findings suggest mentalizing deficits are implicated in the psychological functioning a range of psychiatric disorders, such as psychosis, autism, and borderline personality disorder. Our results also support using the RMET to predict important clinical manifestation among samples with these diagnostic characteristics.
KW - Mentalization
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Reflective function
KW - Systematic review
KW - Theory of mind
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85145949168&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1037/cps0000105
DO - https://doi.org/10.1037/cps0000105
M3 - مقالة
SN - 0969-5893
VL - 29
SP - 423
EP - 439
JO - Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice
JF - Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice
IS - 4
ER -