Abstract
AU Guidelines: Pleaseconfirmthatallheadinglevelsarerepresentedcorrectly concerning the potentially harmful effects of scientific : studies have historically focused on ethical considerations for minimizing risk for participants. However, studies can also indirectly inflict harm on individuals and social groups through how they are designed, reported, and disseminated. As evidenced by recent criticisms and retractions of high-profile studies dealing with a wide variety of social issues, there is a scarcity of resources and guidance on how one can conduct research in a socially responsible manner. As such, even motivated researchers might publish work that has negative social impacts due to a lack of awareness. To address this, we propose 10 simple rules for researchers who wish to conduct socially responsible science. These rules, which cover major considerations throughout the life cycle of a study from inception to dissemination, are not aimed as a prescriptive list or a deterministic code of conduct. Rather, they are meant to help motivated scientists to reflect on their social responsibility as researchers and actively engage with the potential social impact of their research.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e1010954 |
| Journal | PLoS Computational Biology |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 3 March |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Mar 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Modelling and Simulation
- Ecology
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Computational Theory and Mathematics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ten simple rules for socially responsible science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver