TY - JOUR
T1 - Teaching assistants' beliefs regarding example solutions in introductory physics
AU - Lin, Shih Yin
AU - Henderson, Charles
AU - Mamudi, William
AU - Singh, Chandralekha
AU - Yerushalmi, Edit
N1 - University of Pittsburgh, Department of Physics and Astronomy; Western Michigan, Department of Physics and Mallinson Institute for Science Education; Weizmann Institute of Science, Department of Science TeachingWe wish to thank the graduate teaching assistants at University of Pittsburgh, Department of Physics and Astronomy, who gave their valuable time to participate in this study. We wish to thank the PER group in the University of Minnesota, from which the solution artifacts used in this study were developed. We appreciate the support of the University of Pittsburgh, Department of Physics and Astronomy; Western Michigan, Department of Physics and Mallinson Institute for Science Education; and the Weizmann Institute of Science, Department of Science Teaching.
PY - 2013/5/17
Y1 - 2013/5/17
N2 - As part of a larger study to understand instructors' considerations regarding the learning and teaching of problem solving in an introductory physics course, we investigated beliefs of first-year graduate teaching assistants (TAs) regarding the use of example solutions in introductory physics. In particular, we examine how the goal of promoting expertlike problem solving is manifested in the considerations of graduate TAs' choices of example solutions. Twenty-four first-year graduate TAs were asked to discuss their goals for presenting example solutions to students. They were also provided with different example solutions and asked to discuss their preferences for prominent solution features. TAs' awareness, preferences, and actual practices related to solution features were examined in light of recommendations from the literature for the modeling of expertlike problem-solving approaches. The study concludes that the goal of helping students develop an expertlike problem-solving approach underlies many TAs' considerations for the use of example solutions. TAs, however, do not notice and do not use many features described in the research literature as supportive of this goal. A possible explanation for this gap between their belief and practices is that these features conflict with another powerful set of values concerned with keeping students engaged, setting adequate standards, as well as pragmatic considerations such as time requirements and the assignment of grades. Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.
AB - As part of a larger study to understand instructors' considerations regarding the learning and teaching of problem solving in an introductory physics course, we investigated beliefs of first-year graduate teaching assistants (TAs) regarding the use of example solutions in introductory physics. In particular, we examine how the goal of promoting expertlike problem solving is manifested in the considerations of graduate TAs' choices of example solutions. Twenty-four first-year graduate TAs were asked to discuss their goals for presenting example solutions to students. They were also provided with different example solutions and asked to discuss their preferences for prominent solution features. TAs' awareness, preferences, and actual practices related to solution features were examined in light of recommendations from the literature for the modeling of expertlike problem-solving approaches. The study concludes that the goal of helping students develop an expertlike problem-solving approach underlies many TAs' considerations for the use of example solutions. TAs, however, do not notice and do not use many features described in the research literature as supportive of this goal. A possible explanation for this gap between their belief and practices is that these features conflict with another powerful set of values concerned with keeping students engaged, setting adequate standards, as well as pragmatic considerations such as time requirements and the assignment of grades. Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878606586&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.010120
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.010120
M3 - مقالة
SN - 1554-9178
VL - 9
JO - Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research
JF - Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research
IS - 1
M1 - 010120
ER -