TY - JOUR
T1 - Talking While Signing
T2 - The Influence of Simultaneous Communication on the Spoken Language of Bimodal Bilinguals
AU - Rozen-Blay, Or
AU - Novogrodsky, Rama
AU - Degani, Tamar
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
PY - 2022/2/9
Y1 - 2022/2/9
N2 - Purpose: This study aimed to examine how speech while sign (simultaneous communication [SimCom]) affects the spoken language of bimodal bilingual teachers and how individual differences in sign-language vocabulary knowledge, SimCom teaching experience, and the ability to perform speech under dual-task conditions explain the variability in SimCom performance. Method: Forty experienced teachers of deaf and hard of hearing students participated in a story narration task under different conditions. Speech rate, lexical richness, and syntactic complexity were measured and compared across speech-only versus SimCom conditions. Furthermore, participants’ score on a sign-language vocabulary test, their self-reported SimCom teaching experience, and their performance in a dual-task condition were taken as predictors of SimCom narration performance. Results: The findings revealed slower speech rate, lower lexical richness, and lower syntactic complexity in the SimCom condition compared with the speechonly condition. Sign-language vocabulary score and SimCom teaching experience explained speech rate and lexical richness. Participant’s ability to speak under a dual-task condition did not modulate performance. Conclusions: The findings may suggest that the production of the less dominant (sign) language during SimCom entails inhibition of the dominant (spoken) language relative to the speech-only condition. At the same time, the findings are also compatible with the suggestion that SimCom serves as a unique complex communication unit that cannot be reduced to the combination of two languages.
AB - Purpose: This study aimed to examine how speech while sign (simultaneous communication [SimCom]) affects the spoken language of bimodal bilingual teachers and how individual differences in sign-language vocabulary knowledge, SimCom teaching experience, and the ability to perform speech under dual-task conditions explain the variability in SimCom performance. Method: Forty experienced teachers of deaf and hard of hearing students participated in a story narration task under different conditions. Speech rate, lexical richness, and syntactic complexity were measured and compared across speech-only versus SimCom conditions. Furthermore, participants’ score on a sign-language vocabulary test, their self-reported SimCom teaching experience, and their performance in a dual-task condition were taken as predictors of SimCom narration performance. Results: The findings revealed slower speech rate, lower lexical richness, and lower syntactic complexity in the SimCom condition compared with the speechonly condition. Sign-language vocabulary score and SimCom teaching experience explained speech rate and lexical richness. Participant’s ability to speak under a dual-task condition did not modulate performance. Conclusions: The findings may suggest that the production of the less dominant (sign) language during SimCom entails inhibition of the dominant (spoken) language relative to the speech-only condition. At the same time, the findings are also compatible with the suggestion that SimCom serves as a unique complex communication unit that cannot be reduced to the combination of two languages.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124441562&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_jslhr-21-00326
DO - https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_jslhr-21-00326
M3 - Article
C2 - 35050718
SN - 1092-4388
VL - 65
SP - 785
EP - 796
JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
IS - 2
ER -