Abstract
The methods for exposing impacted canines are outlined and the relative merits of using a closed versus open surgical procedure are discussed in relation to the projected long-term prognosis and appearance of the treated outcome. These surgical modalities have a wide range of variations designed for individual circumstances, each of which has advantages in specific cases. Similarly, orthodontic biomechanic protocols vary depending on the 3-dimensional location of the impacted tooth in the maxilla. Each of these factors has an influence on the final outcome. Attempts to provide answers showing a preference for one surgical technique over another using a prospective randomized clinical trial would be difficult in the face of such a wide spectrum of factors.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 27-33 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Seminars in Orthodontics |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Mar 2016 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Orthodontics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Surgical exposure of impacted canines: Open or closed surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver