Surgical exposure of impacted canines: Open or closed surgery

Adrian Becker; Ioannis Zogakis; Ionut Luchian; Stella Chaushu

doi:https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2015.10.005

Surgical exposure of impacted canines: Open or closed surgery

Adrian Becker, Ioannis Zogakis, Ionut Luchian, Stella Chaushu

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The methods for exposing impacted canines are outlined and the relative merits of using a closed versus open surgical procedure are discussed in relation to the projected long-term prognosis and appearance of the treated outcome. These surgical modalities have a wide range of variations designed for individual circumstances, each of which has advantages in specific cases. Similarly, orthodontic biomechanic protocols vary depending on the 3-dimensional location of the impacted tooth in the maxilla. Each of these factors has an influence on the final outcome. Attempts to provide answers showing a preference for one surgical technique over another using a prospective randomized clinical trial would be difficult in the face of such a wide spectrum of factors.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	27-33
Number of pages	7
Journal	Seminars in Orthodontics
Volume	22
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2015.10.005
State	Published - 1 Mar 2016

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Orthodontics

Access to Document

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2015.10.005

Cite this

@article{f9b40f0e21784ca69b9bdd7790e136a6,

title = "Surgical exposure of impacted canines: Open or closed surgery",

abstract = "The methods for exposing impacted canines are outlined and the relative merits of using a closed versus open surgical procedure are discussed in relation to the projected long-term prognosis and appearance of the treated outcome. These surgical modalities have a wide range of variations designed for individual circumstances, each of which has advantages in specific cases. Similarly, orthodontic biomechanic protocols vary depending on the 3-dimensional location of the impacted tooth in the maxilla. Each of these factors has an influence on the final outcome. Attempts to provide answers showing a preference for one surgical technique over another using a prospective randomized clinical trial would be difficult in the face of such a wide spectrum of factors.",

author = "Adrian Becker and Ioannis Zogakis and Ionut Luchian and Stella Chaushu",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016 Elsevier Inc.",

year = "2016",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2015.10.005",

language = "الإنجليزيّة",

volume = "22",

pages = "27--33",

journal = "Seminars in Orthodontics",

issn = "1073-8746",

publisher = "W.B. Saunders",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgical exposure of impacted canines

T2 - Open or closed surgery

AU - Becker, Adrian

AU - Zogakis, Ioannis

AU - Luchian, Ionut

AU - Chaushu, Stella

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - The methods for exposing impacted canines are outlined and the relative merits of using a closed versus open surgical procedure are discussed in relation to the projected long-term prognosis and appearance of the treated outcome. These surgical modalities have a wide range of variations designed for individual circumstances, each of which has advantages in specific cases. Similarly, orthodontic biomechanic protocols vary depending on the 3-dimensional location of the impacted tooth in the maxilla. Each of these factors has an influence on the final outcome. Attempts to provide answers showing a preference for one surgical technique over another using a prospective randomized clinical trial would be difficult in the face of such a wide spectrum of factors.

AB - The methods for exposing impacted canines are outlined and the relative merits of using a closed versus open surgical procedure are discussed in relation to the projected long-term prognosis and appearance of the treated outcome. These surgical modalities have a wide range of variations designed for individual circumstances, each of which has advantages in specific cases. Similarly, orthodontic biomechanic protocols vary depending on the 3-dimensional location of the impacted tooth in the maxilla. Each of these factors has an influence on the final outcome. Attempts to provide answers showing a preference for one surgical technique over another using a prospective randomized clinical trial would be difficult in the face of such a wide spectrum of factors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961137458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2015.10.005

DO - https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2015.10.005

M3 - مقالة

SN - 1073-8746

VL - 22

SP - 27

EP - 33

JO - Seminars in Orthodontics

JF - Seminars in Orthodontics

IS - 1

ER -

Surgical exposure of impacted canines: Open or closed surgery

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this