TY - JOUR
T1 - Stress-mediated tuning of developmental robustness and plasticity in flies
AU - Elgart, Michael
AU - Snir, Orli
AU - Soen, Yoav
N1 - Sir John Templeton Foundation [40663]; Israel Science Foundation [1860/13]This work was supported by the Sir John Templeton Foundation (grant ID: #40663) and the Israel Science Foundation (grant No. 1860/13). YS is Incumbent of the Daniel E. Koshland Sr. Career Development Chair at the Weizmann Institute.
PY - 2015/4
Y1 - 2015/4
N2 - Organisms have to be sufficiently robust to environmental and genetic perturbations, yet plastic enough to cope with stressful scenarios to which they are not fully adapted. How this apparent conflict between robustness and plasticity is resolved at the cellular and whole organism levels is not clear. Here we review and discuss evidence in flies suggesting that the environment can modulate the balance between robustness and plasticity. The outcomes of this modulation can vary from mild sensitizations that are hardly noticeable, to overt qualitative changes in phenotype. The effects could be at both the cellular and whole organism levels and can include cellular de-/trans-differentiation ('Cellular reprogramming') and gross disfigurements such as homeotic transformations (Tissue/whole organism reprogramming'). When the stress is mild enough, plastic changes in some processes may prevent drastic changes in more robust traits such as cell identity and tissue integrity. However, when the stress is sufficiently severe, this buffering may no longer be able to prevent such overt changes, and the resulting phenotypic variability could be subjected to selection and might assist survival at the population level. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Stress as a fundamental theme in cell plasticity.
AB - Organisms have to be sufficiently robust to environmental and genetic perturbations, yet plastic enough to cope with stressful scenarios to which they are not fully adapted. How this apparent conflict between robustness and plasticity is resolved at the cellular and whole organism levels is not clear. Here we review and discuss evidence in flies suggesting that the environment can modulate the balance between robustness and plasticity. The outcomes of this modulation can vary from mild sensitizations that are hardly noticeable, to overt qualitative changes in phenotype. The effects could be at both the cellular and whole organism levels and can include cellular de-/trans-differentiation ('Cellular reprogramming') and gross disfigurements such as homeotic transformations (Tissue/whole organism reprogramming'). When the stress is mild enough, plastic changes in some processes may prevent drastic changes in more robust traits such as cell identity and tissue integrity. However, when the stress is sufficiently severe, this buffering may no longer be able to prevent such overt changes, and the resulting phenotypic variability could be subjected to selection and might assist survival at the population level. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Stress as a fundamental theme in cell plasticity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028148942&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.08.004
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.08.004
M3 - مقالة
SN - 1874-9399
VL - 1849
SP - 462
EP - 466
JO - Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms
JF - Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms
IS - 4
ER -